Sunday, March 21, 2010

Virginia's Offshore Drilling

Offshore drilling AFP.jpg

On Wednesday, March 10, Governor Bob McDonnellsigned a bill to enable offshore drilling for oil and natural gas about 50 miles off the coast of Virginia.

This proposed plan is a part of McDonnell’s goal to make our state the “Energy Capital of the East Coast.” While being the first to tap into oil and natural gas

in the Atlantic may provide many people with jobs and supply our state with billions in revenue we can’t ignore the fact that there are much cleaner, renewable

energy sources such as solar and wind power that could boost our state’s economy just as well.

While many argue that offshore drilling isn't worth the risks to the environment, there are others in the community who strongly support McDonnell’s push

for the offshore drilling bill. Virginian Representative Eric Cantor (R) is the most recent politician trying to convince U.S. Secretary Ken Salazar to allow this bill

to pass. And if it does pass, we will be next in line after Alaska, Texas, and Louisiana, which already possess offshore drilling platforms for oil and gas.

The 2.9 million acres off the shore of Virginia where the proposed drilling would occur could house 130 million barrels of oil and 1.1 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.

Nevertheless, Governor McDonnell wants the maps of this proposed area drawn by the Minerals Management Service to be reevaluated to enable more bang for the buck.

According to McDonnell, “The map that’s currently drawn by MMS is not particularly favorable for Virginia.” The American Petroleum Institute also said in an

evaluation that there could actually be more gas and oil reserves in this area because seismic studies have not been conducted in the region for decades.

But there is still the question of ‘Is offshore drilling the answer?’ to our energy problem.

Offshore drilling is only a small step towards energy production, but it is not guaranteed to last forever. The U.S. should rather work to establish more policies

for the production of alternative fuels and renewable energy such as solar or wind power to allow for a more sustainable energy system. Many environmentalists

also insist on the creation of offshore wind turbines, which could supply enough energy to provide our whole state with electricity.

In the future, using wind turbines, developing new automobile technologies, or building a mass transit system would help alleviate the great American need for oil

and could possibly be even more beneficial to our state than building these proposed oil drilling platforms off the coast. offshore3.jpg

1 comment:

  1. I find this entry intriguing due to the recent events with BP oil rig disaster. I do not know a lot about the the bill that enables offshore drilling for oil and natural gas off the coast of Virginia but I would be interested to see if the ongoing chaos in the Gulf Coast will change the status of this bill in Virginia. Now, almost two months after the bill was signed, will the BP Disaster change thoughts and make Virginia officials reconsider constructing oil-rigs off their coast? According to the Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/03/AR2010050304098.html?hpid=topnews) some leaders are indeed reconsidering their support. But McDonnell seems to still be pushing for the new drilling for oil and natural gas. This is an issue to be watched in the coming weeks. A study in intergovernmental relations. It is also an interesting example of how environmental happenings in one part of the country can affect legislation elsewhere. This current disaster also calls into question our EPP theme of Compliance Costs, I wonder what the cost will be when this is all said and done. Already some estimates are around $14 billion that BP will have to pay.

    ReplyDelete